The Swedish paradox: or is there really no gender difference in acute coronary syndromes?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Swedish paradox: or is there really no gender difference in acute coronary syndromes?
Over many years, gender differences in medical care have been reported, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Across the industrialized world, CVD shows a continuous increase over the last decades and is the major cause of morbidity and mortality for men as well as for women. Moreover, the impact of CVD on overall mortality rates in Europe is even higher for women than it...
متن کاملIs There Really A Green Paradox?
Optimal climate policy is studied in a Ramsey growth model with exhaustible oil reserves, an infinitely elastic supply of renewables, stock-dependent oil extraction costs and convex climate damages. We concentrate on economies with an initial capital stock below that of the steady state of the carbon-free economy and the initial cost of oil (extraction cost plus scarcity rent and social cost of...
متن کاملClickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference?
A growing number of physics teachers are currently turning to instructional technologies such as wireless handheld response systems —colloquially called clickers. Two possible rationales may explain the growing interest in these devices. The first is the presumption that clickers are more effective instructional instruments. The second rationale is somewhat reminiscent of Martin Davis’ declarat...
متن کاملIs There a Role for Colchicine in Acute Coronary Syndromes?
I n this issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA), Martinez et al demonstrate for the first time in man, that the crystal-induced NLRP3 inflammasome is activated within clinically stable coronary atherosclerotic plaque as evidenced by increased levels of IL-1ß and IL-18 in coronary sinus sampling, and that its expression is enhanced in the presence of unstable coronary plaq...
متن کاملThere is No Paradox of Logical Validity
A number of arguments, including (Whittle 2004), (Field 2008), (Shapiro 2012), and (Beall & Murzi 2012), have been put forward for the claim that logical validity is plagued by a paradox (or paradoxes) similar to the more well-known paradoxes that afflict notions such as truth, knowledge, or set. These claims are incorrect. As I will show here, there is no paradox of logical validity. In additi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Heart Journal
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0195-668X,1522-9645
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr375